domingo, 8 de septiembre de 2024   inicia sesión o regístrate
 
Protestante Digital

 
 

The Thirties: What about the church?

I don’t want to condemn the church in the 1930s without acknowledging how easily cowed the church in the 2020s might prove to be. 

BIBLICAL PREACHING AUTOR 108/Peter_Mead 04 DE JULIO DE 2024 09:41 h
Hitler meeting the catholic nuncio to Germany, Cesare Orsenigo, in 1935. / Photo: [link]Claireislovely[/link], Wikipedia.

The question I brought into my reading of Albert C. Grzesinksi’s (ACG) book was more specific than society. I wanted to know what was happening in the church during those years of transition to tyranny. 



And is there anything we can learn for our tumultuous times?



The Catholic Church agreed a concordat with the Nazi party in 1933. It gave the church a lot of freedom and protection.  But at a cost. “Catholic clergy were deprived of their civil rights. Political activity was forbidden.” (p205) 



Ironically, they kept their position of influence in society, while relinquishing their ability to say anything constructive.  I have watched many wrestle with this tension in recent years. 



Should we strive to keep our “voice” in society by following the rules imposed by the media, or do we speak out about concerns and thereby invite society’s opposition? 



“To oppose the encroachments by the Third Reich, the churches should have united and fought jointly the common danger, but here as in the political field, the spirit as well as the prerequisites to such unity were sadly lacking. As to the Protestant Church, the wealthy parishioners and the Protestant middle class were in favor of the Nazi regime. …Neither then nor later did the Protestant clergy show a common will and determination in defense of their rights.” (p206) 



It is intriguing that those with some societal standing (in terms of their wealth status) are identified as supporting the regime. 



Surely, if the benefits are to be weighed in terms of income and status, that should be a warning flag that the motives may be somewhat corrupted.



Is it possible to imagine a church in our time that goes along with a rogue government or popular narrative in order to keep its voice in society?  But what if it already has little to no voice?  What is it protecting?



“The Nazi aim in the field of religion is the establishment of a co-ordinated German church under party supervision. … Their publicly proclaimed thesis is “The word of Adolf Hitler is the word of God and has the authority of God.” (p206) 



It was not just moral madness that should have been opposed, but also the religious heresy of the time.



Even within the 1930’s, there was a growing religious fervor in silent protests against the Nazi regime.  What if they had not capitulated initially to take the easy path and keep their influence?  What if the church had been willing to take a stand from the start?



There was a concerted effort to undermine the church’s influence in society.  The black-shirts, the elite guards, were forbidden to belong to any religion.  The Hitler Youth movement estranged a generation from churches.



“Church services are held under observation of the Gestapo, the state secret police. Clergymen who have held services outside the church confines in order to escape police supervision have been arrested and sent to concentration camps.” (p208)



Church leaders and members were subjected to every possible charge and slander. “They are accused of immorality, corruption and violation of government regulations. . .Occasional cases of law violations are blatantly generalized.” (p208) 



It is hard to stand for what is right and true, but is that not what all believers are called to do in this fallen world?  We represent Jesus and the Gospel.  Always with grace and love, but sometimes with courage and a willingness to pay the ultimate price. 



And when we capitulate in order to have a voice in society, what happens when society wakes up to the truth and then wonders why the church didn’t say anything? 



Is it better to have a voice, or to use it? 



I don’t want to condemn the church in the 1930s without acknowledging how easily cowed the church in the 2020s might prove to be. 



As Dietrich Bonhoeffer famously wrote, “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”



Peter Mead, mentor at Cor Deo and author of several books. He blogs at Biblical Preaching.



[analysis]



[title]One more year[/title]

[photo][/photo]

[text]At Evangelical Focus, we have a sustainability challenge ahead. We invite you to join those across Europe and beyond who are committed with our mission. Together, we will ensure the continuity of Evangelical Focus and Protestante Digital (Spanish) in 2024.





Learn all about our #OneMoreYearEF campaign here (English).



[/text][/analysis]



 


 

 


0
COMENTARIOS

    Si quieres comentar o

 



 
 
ESTAS EN: - - - The Thirties: What about the church?
 
 
Síguenos en Ivoox
Síguenos en YouTube y en Vimeo
 
 
RECOMENDACIONES
 
PATROCINADORES
 

 
AEE
PROTESTANTE DIGITAL FORMA PARTE DE LA: Alianza Evangélica Española
MIEMBRO DE: Evangelical European Alliance (EEA) y World Evangelical Alliance (WEA)
 

Las opiniones vertidas por nuestros colaboradores se realizan a nivel personal, pudiendo coincidir o no con la postura de la dirección de Protestante Digital.