martes, 23 de abril de 2024   inicia sesión o regístrate
 
Protestante Digital

 
 

Bad language?

First and foremost, disabled people (of any age) have the right to use whatever words, labels, descriptions etc. that they feel are applicable for them.

THE ADDITIONAL NEEDS BLOGFATHER AUTOR 242/Mark_Arnold 10 DE JUNIO DE 2022 10:44 h
Image via [link]The Additional Needs Blogfather[/link].

I recently asked a whole bunch of parents of disabled children, and disabled people themselves, what they think of as some of the most inappropriate or downright offensive language that they have heard or experienced as a result of their own or their child’s disability.



The result was a huge discussion that produced a massive list of words and phrases, far more than there is space for in this blog post, although I’ve included a list of some of the most quoted ones below…



What also emerged is that there isn’t universal agreement on some of this; some words, labels and descriptions are owned by some people and anathema to others.



What is clear, however, is that first and foremost, disabled people (of any age) have the right to use whatever words, labels, descriptions etc. that they feel are applicable for them, and nobody has the right to tell them that they are wrong.



So, caveats all in place, here’s just some of the words that people mentioned, starting with the ones used to belittle, diminish, put down, be nasty to, or otherwise insult disabled children and indeed adults too.



I’ve sorted them alphabetically, and even just doing that I was deeply troubled by this list…



Antisocial

Bad (as in ‘bad behaviour’)

Behind

Cold

Crazy

Cruel

Cursed

Dangerous

Defective

Disruptive

Doesn’t care (also, ‘lacks empathy’)

Dumb

Freak

Has ‘issues’

Idiot

Lame (as in dull, uninspiring; see other use below)

Naughty

Not normal

Pitiful

Rude

Slow

Strange

Stupid

Ugly

Waste of space

Wrong (as in ‘something is wrong with them’)



(There were many more words than this sent to me, I’ve only included a selection here)



A few other words came up that have historical use, and which should be consigned to history, but it seems are still in use by some people today, including professionals who should know better…



Handicapped

Retarded

Spastic



A few people picked up on words that are used in literature, even in fairly modern versions of the Bible for example, such as…



Cripple

Lame (as in walks with difficulty, see other use above)



Other words or phrases that deserve their own category include these…



A bit special… (as in ‘they’re a bit special’, or ‘a bit Autistic’ or ‘a bit OCD’, for example)

Doesn’t look… (as in, ‘he doesn’t look Autistic to me’, usually by someone with no relevant experience)

Fits (rather than the more encompassing ‘seizures’ that reflects the wide range of seizure activity)

Has/have e.g. Autism (rather than ‘is Autistic’)

High/Low Functioning etc. especially related to Autism (generally falling out of use, often unhelpful)

Mum/Dad (when being referred to by professionals, often received as condescending)

Non-verbal (rather than ‘limited functional verbal language’ which recognises that some/most sounds are still communication)

Service user/Client (when being referred to by professionals, often received as impersonal)

Severe (when in reference to e.g. Autism, ADHD, or other neurodivergencies)

Suffers/Sufferer (as in, ‘she suffers from Cerebral Palsy’)

Wheelchair ‘bound’ (rather that ‘uses a wheelchair’)



There is also a wide debate as to what the most appropriate phrase to use is out of…



Special Needs vs Additional (Learning/Support) Needs vs Disability/Disabled



While ‘Disability’ is a term defined in law, the terms ‘Special Needs’ or ‘Additional Needs’ (‘Additional Learning Needs’ in Wales, ‘Additional Support Needs’ in Scotland) are less clearly defined, and although ‘Additional Needs’ is generally in wider use now,



‘Special Educational Needs’ or SEN (sometimes ‘SEND’ adding Disability on the end) is in common use when referring to school age children.



What was generally agreed on is that terms such as ‘differently abled’ shouldn’t be used.



Almost finally, there is a helpful website was suggested that adds some further thoughts to this conversation. 



And finally, just a reminder that some of the above is open to debate, discussion and polite disagreement; please be nice if you are in the ‘disagreement’ camp.



As I mentioned at the beginning, it is up to disabled children and adults themselves to decide what terms to use (or not use) regarding themselves, and however passionate we might be about stopping or promoting the use of certain words and phrases, we should all respect the rights of each individual to use what they feel is right for them.



As for me, I’ll let my last words on this not actually be mine but T.S. Eliot’s, “For last year’s words belong to last year’s language. And next year’s words await another voice.”



Mark Arnold, Director of Additional Needs Ministry at Urban Saints. Arnold blogs at The Additional Needs Blogfather. This article was re-published with permission.


 

 


0
COMENTARIOS

    Si quieres comentar o

 



 
 
ESTAS EN: - - - Bad language?
 
 
Síguenos en Ivoox
Síguenos en YouTube y en Vimeo
 
 
RECOMENDACIONES
 
PATROCINADORES
 

 
AEE
PROTESTANTE DIGITAL FORMA PARTE DE LA: Alianza Evangélica Española
MIEMBRO DE: Evangelical European Alliance (EEA) y World Evangelical Alliance (WEA)
 

Las opiniones vertidas por nuestros colaboradores se realizan a nivel personal, pudiendo coincidir o no con la postura de la dirección de Protestante Digital.